Centre for Alternative Dispute Resolution, 
RGNUL, Punjab

Dewansh Awasthi This article re-examines the implications of Gayatri Balasamy v. ISG Novasoft Technologies Ltd. for judicial intervention under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, focusing on the implications Pre-Gayatri Balasamy judgements with regard to the tension between corrective powers and arbitral finality. It argues that expanded remedial powers must remain subject to strict thresholds of judicial restraint, distinguishing due-process violations

Ayush Srivastava, Himani Khullar* This article re-examines interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, post-2015 amendments. It analyses judicial thresholds for “inefficacious” tribunal remedies, the consequences of non-compliance with the 90-day mandate, and procedural tensions between Sections 9, 17, and 37. It critiques emerging jurisprudence, including recourse to Article 227, and evaluates proposed reforms signalling a shift towards arbi

Vani Sharma This article examines whether arbitration in anti-doping disputes truly ensures fairness for athletes, highlighting how strict liability and evidentiary burdens disproportionately disadvantage them. Through recent CAS cases, it shows that outcomes often hinge on access to resources and expert evidence. It argues for targeted reforms to address these structural inequities and make procedural fairness meaningful in practice. Introduction International sports bodies